Home » Trade Marks » Trade Mark Tribunal – Fast Track Opposition Procedure at the UKIPO

Trade Mark Tribunal – Fast Track Opposition Procedure at the UKIPO

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page.

Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified.

This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked.

This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

For the avoidance of doubt Keltie LLP and K2 IP Limited have no liability as to the content of IPcopy and any related tweets or social media posts.

Privacy Policy

IPcopy’s Privacy Policy can be viewed here.

UKIPOlogoIn a recent post we looked at a consultation from the UKIPO which was proposing superfast patent processing. That’s not the only consultation that is running at the UKIPO and there is a further one entitled “Fast Track Opposition Procedure. Trade Mark Tribunal”. This consultation is running until 17 May 2013 and seeks the views of users and potential users of the UK national registration system about the introduction of a lower cost “fast track” opposition based on earlier registered or pending marks.

As noted in the consultation a fast track opposition process may differ from the existing procedures in a number of ways, namely:

  1. Lower opposition fee
  2. Grounds limited to s.5(1)/5(2)
  3. Limit to the number of earlier marks that can be relied upon
  4. If over 5 years old, proof of use to be filed with the notice of opposition using a pro-forma statement with exhibits
  5. Leave required for either party to file any further evidence
  6. Decisions normally from the papers
  7. Introduction of refundable appeal fee large enough to discourage frivolous appeals

The full reasoning behind the above proposals can be found in the consultation document but a few issues with the proposals, as highlighted by our trade mark team, are noted below:

a)      The opposition fee is currently only £200 so there seems little benefit in lowering it further, even given the reasons in the consultation document;

b)      Limiting an opposition to s.5(1)/5(2) grounds only could be bad news as being able to rely on reputation is very important for trade mark owners who have reputation.

c)      Limiting the number of marks that can be relied upon potentially means that it might not be possible to put your best case forward;

d)     A mandatory requirement for evidence of use of marks that are more than 5 years old would make it a lot more expensive for the owners of those marks to enforce their rights in opposition.

The general feeling within Keltie is that the UK opposition procedure is currently well run. Delays within the system depend on the parties applying for cooling off periods or extensions of time rather than any inbuilt delays within the process. The UKIPO has, however, become quite strict on repeated extensions and the cooling off period is entered into by the parties of their own will, i.e. the delay is their decision. Without such extensions/cooling off periods the UKIPO comes to decisions in a reasonable time to give the case a fair hearing.


Mark Richardson   2 May 2013

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: