Home » Law » The Hand Test Revisited

The Hand Test Revisited

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page.

Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified.

This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked.

This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

For the avoidance of doubt Keltie LLP and K2 IP Limited have no liability as to the content of IPcopy and any related tweets or social media posts.

Privacy Policy

IPcopy’s Privacy Policy can be viewed here.

Most patent attorneys at some point in their career will have been introduced to the “Hand Test”.  This is a rule of thumb (well, four fingers and a thumb) test to determine whether a claim is useful.  There are various versions, but a familiar one is for Claim 1 of a patent to be printed out – for the sake of argument and objectivity, let’s say in 12 point Times Roman with one-and-a-half spacing – and for a patent attorney (let’s say one taking size 8 in gloves) to try to cover it with their hand laid flat, with fingers together, on the paper over the printed claim.  If there are lines of text showing above or below the hand, the claim is generally not infringed by the embodiment of interest, avoidable by one simple workaround or another, or simply impossible to infringe.

While this test is crude, it feels broadly appropriate when applied to some technical disciplines, such as mechanical engineering.  It may have less application elsewhere.  I’ve seen it used as a principle in setting metrics for patent attorneys – rewards were given for getting independent claims to grant at under a predetermined word length.  Chemists did rather well under this system, as a claim such as:

“A composition for use for some purpose or other, comprising:

                         at least 50% of this stuff;

                         at least 30% of that stuff; and

                         no more than 10% of some other stuff”

will often be the best way to characterise the invention, and is usually extremely short.  By contrast, in most IT cases the drafting attorney will just have started to define the first functional element of the invention by this point in Claim 1.

It would be good to put the Hand Test to the test, but any objective assessment would require more time than I currently have available.  I would however be very interested to know:

(a)       the longest claim found to be infringed;

(b)       the shortest claim found to be valid; and

(c)        more about any study that there may have been considering infringement and claim length.

References, please, not hearsay.  There are two word claims found in two US patents – see the collections of patent records thoughtfully provided by others here and here for more details – but I may need a chemist to tell me whether either was valid.

In all these cases, “long” and “short” relate to numbers of words in the claim.  For the purposes of effective comparison, it would also be best if only one language was considered at a time – nothing (and no-one) needs many words in technical German.  I hope that I’ll be able to provide you with an update on this burning topic in a few weeks.

1 Comment

  1. […] Amazon wasn’t concerning itself with the Hand Test at this […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: