Home » Law » Bonza Aussie Rules

Bonza Aussie Rules

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page.

Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified.

This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked.

This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

For the avoidance of doubt Keltie LLP and K2 IP Limited have no liability as to the content of IPcopy and any related tweets or social media posts.

Privacy Policy

IPcopy’s Privacy Policy can be viewed here.

Strewth! A patents act amendment?

Strewth! A patents act amendment?

Following in the footsteps of many other patent offices around the world, Australia has put in place an amendment to the Patents Act 1990 that will come into force on 15 April 2013. In a perceived effort to ‘raise the bar’ of patentability – a catchy but meaningless phrase coined by the European Patent Office a few years ago – a number of new standards have been introduced into the statute. The new measures include a more rigorous approach to examination of inventive step that increases the scope for IPO Examiners to consider obviousness from the perspective of a non-Australian skilled person. There is also a significant reduction in the term for ensuring the application proceeds to acceptance, from 21 months from issuance of the first Examination Report down to a fleeting12 months. The expected effect of these measures is to make it harder to get the broad scope of patent protection that is currently expected by many applicants in Australia.

The advice issuing from many Australian patent attorney firms is for applicants who have pending applications in Australia to request examination before 15 April 2013 in order to benefit from the current more lenient standards. Presumably, those with pending International patent applications could also enter the Australian National Phase early as well if Australia is seen as a key market.

It has been interesting to watch how Australia has grappled with the problem of how to use intellectual property law as a stimulus for home grown creativity and innovation. The successful mining and commodities markets have insulated the Australian economy from the worst aspects of the global economic downturn and yet the most adept, and some might say rapacious, users of their IP system are foreign corporations who perceive the currently lax IP criteria as an easy and cheap way to secure broad monopolies in the growing Southeast Asia/Pacific region. Clearly the pendulum has swung the other way and the current amendment will bring Australia’s patent laws closer to those in Europe, the US, China and Japan.


  1. ipcopymark says:

    The following question was raised by Mark Daniels (Browne Jacobson LLP) on LinkedIn: Will this affect innovation patents in any way?

    According to IP Australia the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act 2012 raises the patentability requirements for Standard Patents. However, the ‘innovative step’ test for Innovation Patents has not been amended.

    We note however that a public consultation has recently been run with regard to Innovation Patents and in particular the need to address an emerging problem with tactical use of Innovation Patents, which creates uncertainty in the market place and blocks follow-on innovation. Further details on this consultation (which has now closed) can be found at the Word document here – http://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/about-us/public-consultations/innovation-patent-consultation/

    The Innovation Patent consultation proposed raising the patentability threshold for Innovation Patents to the same level of inventiveness as required for Standard Patents.

    • Mark Daniels says:

      Thanks Mark. Having had some experience working with innovation patents recently, I would echo the call for raising the standard of what constitutes ‘innovation’.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: