Home » Patents » The Unitary Patent and the UPC – CIPA seminar 19th November 2013

The Unitary Patent and the UPC – CIPA seminar 19th November 2013

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page.

Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified.

This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked.

This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

For the avoidance of doubt Keltie LLP and K2 IP Limited have no liability as to the content of IPcopy and any related tweets or social media posts.

Privacy Policy

IPcopy’s Privacy Policy can be viewed here.

cipalogoYesterday I had the pleasure of speaking at the CIPA seminar “The Unitary Patent and the UPC” with Alan Johnson of Bristows LLP and Tim Roberts. A copy of the slides for my section of the talk is enclosed below along with some links to additional information covered in the talk (the Poland Deloitte report and some views on the impact of the Scottish Referendum).

My section of the talk (the slides of which can be accessed here) focussed on the unitary patent, as opposed to the court system.

Poland – As noted during the seminar Poland were strong advocates of the unitary patent system when they had the EU Council presidency but have subsequently got cold feet and have, as a consequence, not signed the Unified Patent Court agreement. The Polish position changed following a report from Deloitte in June 2012 into the potential impact of the unitary patent system on the Polish economy. Although I have not seen the original Deloitte report I note that this paper (“The European Unified Patent Court: Assessment and Implications of the Federalisation of the Patent System in Europe“) by Dimitris Xenos at the University of East London has a section (see 4.2.2) devoted to the report and its findings. The Deloitte report apparently looked at two options (joining the unitary system and staying outside the system) and worked out cost implications for three different scenarios based on the number of unitary patents that may be validated. The moderate scenario generated a net cost to the Polish economy of 19 Billion Euros if they joined the unitary patent system compared to staying outside!

Scotland – The impact that the Scottish Referendum could have on the unitary patent system is something of an unknown quantity. This post from the Scottish Constitutional Futures Forum outlines the alternative takes on the Referendum.

Translations – The translation regulation for the unitary patent system often seems to be the overlooked document (compared to the unitary patent regulation, the UPC agreement and the Rules of Procedure). The translation regulation however still has the potential to cause issues when the system goes live. Read this post from Charles Russell for the issues that may develop around the definition of an SME.

SPCs – For the latest on the unitary patent system and SPCs please read Alan’s post here.

For IPcopy’s full post on the “Maltese Muddle” situation please see here.

Mark Richardson  20 November 2013

1 Comment

  1. Anonymous says:

    On EU expansion I would have thought that Montengro (a candidate country for EU expansion http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/countries/detailed-country-information/montenegro/index_en.htm) and Bosnia (potential candidate) are much more problematic than those listed as they aren’t yet signed up to the EPC.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: