Home » Patents » EQE Pre-exam 2015 – Downward adjustment to results?

EQE Pre-exam 2015 – Downward adjustment to results?

Keltie LLP

K2 IP Limited

About IPcopy

IPcopy is an intellectual property related news site covering a wide variety of IP related news and issues. We will also take the odd lighthearted look at IP. Feel free to contact us via the details on the About Us page.

Disclaimer: Unless stated otherwise, the contributors to IPcopy (the "IPcopy writers") are patent and trade mark attorneys or patent and trade mark assistants at Keltie LLP or are network attorneys at K2 IP Limited. Guest contributors will be identified.

This news site is the personal site of the contributors and is not edited by the authors' employer in any way. From time to time however IPcopy may publish practice notes, legal updates and marketing news from Keltie LLP or K2 IP Limited. Any such posts will be clearly marked.

This news site is for information purposes only. Information posted to this news site is not legal advice and should not be taken as such. If you require IP related legal advice please contact your legal representative.

For the avoidance of doubt Keltie LLP and K2 IP Limited have no liability as to the content of IPcopy and any related tweets or social media posts.

Privacy Policy

IPcopy’s Privacy Policy can be viewed here.

epologoThe results for the EQE pre-exam were released yesterday (Friday 20 March) and IPcopy would like to extend its congratulations to those of you that passed. We would also like to sound a slight note of caution. The Delta Patents blog post for the 2015 results has highlighted that the marks that were available online may have been adjusted down by 1 or 2 marks at some point during the day yesterday. If you were a borderline pass it could be worth rechecking your results.

The potential mark adjustment issue seems to have arisen from the exceptional case that one of the questions (20.2) was deemed to have been constructed in a sufficiently complex fashion that it was decided to award marks for the answer being “True” as well as “False” – see the bottom of page 9 of the Examiner’s report.

Delta Patents analysis suggests that almost half of the candidates sitting the paper will have experienced a downward mark adjustment (of 1 or 2 marks) and 16 people may have migrated south across the Pass-Fail border.

However, subsequent comments on the Delta Patents blog indicate that some candidates have seen a “bounce” in their marks in which they initially dropped marks and then gained marks back later in the day.

The online results page of course carries a disclaimer that only the results in your letter are binding. However, it is pretty troubling in IPcopy’s opinion that the online results were allowed to be released without being verified and properly checked.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: